<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Business Intelligence Blog &#187; Performance Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/category/performance-management/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebiblog.com</link>
	<description>Slicing Business Dicing Intelligence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Readmission Rates: A Step Toward Better Healthcare BI</title>
		<link>http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2009/08/readmission-rates-a-step-toward-better-healthcare-bi.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2009/08/readmission-rates-a-step-toward-better-healthcare-bi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 17:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guru Kirthigavasan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readmission Rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiblog.com/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s take a step back for a moment to see the trend in performance measurement in healthcare. Most quality measurements on the clinical side of healthcare deal with the inputs to care. For instance, HEDIS measures such as weight assessment and counseling for nutrition and physical activity for children and adolescents, well-child exams, childhood immunizations, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Let’s take a step back for a moment to see the trend in performance measurement in healthcare. Most quality measurements on the clinical side of healthcare deal with the inputs to care. For instance, HEDIS measures such as weight assessment and counseling for nutrition and physical activity for children and adolescents, well-child exams, childhood immunizations, breast cancer screening, cholesterol management for patients with cardiovascular condition, etc. measure the actions taken by healthcare providers to improve health. Joint Commission measures also evaluate the inputs leading to healthy outcomes. Readmission rates are an example of measurements of the results of those actions in terms of whether the inputs worked the first time. Analysis of these results will lead to further analysis of the inputs that led to a readmission, or better yet, to the inputs that prevented a readmission.</p>
<p>This means that clinical performance measurement will come full circle. In doing so, clinical performance measurement will mirror financial performance measurement. No business would have its financial analysts measure investments or operational activity without evaluating them in terms of the results on the bottom line. Nor would that business simply report the financial results without a thorough analysis of the causes for those results. We take this for granted in financial management. We will now be seeing more of this cause and effect analysis in clinical performance management as well.</p></blockquote>
<p>Interesting <a href="http://www.b-eye-network.com/view/11040">post</a> by Scott Wanless in B-Eye Network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2009/08/readmission-rates-a-step-toward-better-healthcare-bi.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Core Performance Management Vendors for 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2008/02/the-core-performance-management-vendors-for-2008.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2008/02/the-core-performance-management-vendors-for-2008.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guru Kirthigavasan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BI Vendors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Objects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B-Eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPM Partners]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2008/02/the-core-performance-management-vendors-for-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, all the ones whom you think about are there. No Misses. Good Going !! Read More about each of these vendors on the story. There are 9 vendors on the core list for 2008, same number as last year. This may surprise some people after all of the mergers and resulting consolidation of 2007. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, all the ones whom you think about <a href="http://www.b-eye-network.com/view/index.php?cid=6868">are there</a>. No Misses. Good Going !! </p>
<p>Read More about each of these vendors on the story.</p>
<blockquote><p>There are 9 vendors on the core list for 2008, same number as last year. This may surprise some people after all of the mergers and resulting consolidation of 2007. The fact is that some vendors that were not on this list before have now made it because of their acquisitions. Therefore, while the number is the same, the names of the vendors on the list have changed quite a bit. In addition, some smaller vendors that have been around for awhile have broadened their product set or customer base or both and now merit inclusion. Here now, in alphabetical order, are the core performance management vendors for 2008.</p>
<p>Adaptive Planning<br />
Clarity Systems<br />
IBM/Cognos<br />
Infor<br />
Longview systems<br />
Microsoft<br />
Oracle<br />
SAP<br />
SAS
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thebiblog.com/archives/2008/02/the-core-performance-management-vendors-for-2008.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.275 seconds -->

